Talk:OS upgrade files: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→It could be great: TI-Nspire/TI-Nspire CAS + TI-84 !: new section) |
(→A small question about RSA cracking: new section) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Has someone added CAS to TI-Nspire? | Has someone added CAS to TI-Nspire? | ||
It could be great: TI-Nspire/TI-Nspire CAS + TI-84 ! | It could be great: TI-Nspire/TI-Nspire CAS + TI-84 ! | ||
== A small question about RSA cracking == | |||
Shouldn't we be trying to crack the hardcoded key in boot1 instead of the other keys? | |||
TI can easily change the keys used in boot2 and the OS but they can't upgrade a boot1 key. | |||
Not saying a 1024bit key is going to be crackable any time soon, but something to think about (unless there's something glaringly obvious I'm missing here)? | |||
Latest revision as of 07:48, 13 July 2011
Hey, could you give us a tree of the zipped FS contents? And a dump of files in it? -- squalyl 16:06, 6 August 2007 (CEST)
- OK for the tree, but I can't upload anything that, it would be illegal. ExtendeD 16:27, 6 August 2007 (CEST)
Everything on that page seems to be quite the same for the version 1.6. But the .tnc file for the version 1.6 is 6 Mb compared to the 5.2 Mn for the 1.4 --AdRiWeB 00:28, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
It could be great: TI-Nspire/TI-Nspire CAS + TI-84 !
Has someone added CAS to TI-Nspire? It could be great: TI-Nspire/TI-Nspire CAS + TI-84 !
A small question about RSA cracking
Shouldn't we be trying to crack the hardcoded key in boot1 instead of the other keys?
TI can easily change the keys used in boot2 and the OS but they can't upgrade a boot1 key.
Not saying a 1024bit key is going to be crackable any time soon, but something to think about (unless there's something glaringly obvious I'm missing here)?